|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
|
If there were a draft in the US, should women be drafted?   |
|
|
|
 Replies: 64 — Last Post Aug. 23 9:19am by draakprinses
|
|
|
|
|
Web Resources: Rape Myths Dispelled, Help & Information about Rape
USA Rape, Abuse and Incest Hotline: 1-800-656-HOPE (1-800-656-4673)
|
Web Resources: Teen Pregnancy Facts, Abortion Facts
USA Youth Crisis Hotline: 1-800-448-4663
|
| Choice |
Votes |
Percent |
|
| Yes |
33 |
64% |
|
| No |
13 |
25% |
|
| 1/4 |
5 |
9% |
|
| Vote Now! |
51 Votes Cast |
|
|
|
|
|
Alabamarama
Visionary
 Patron
Support Leader
|
     
No, they should not. 1) Men would become overly protective of the women, especially if a relationship begins, and be distracted from tasks at hand. 2) If bunked together the men and women would be prone to sex. This would, undoubtedly, lead to unwanted pregnancies. 3) Funding would increase dramatically. 4) If a man is captured he is prone to physical abuse and death. If a woman is captured she is prone to physical abuse, death, and rape, etc. 5) Men can go months without sickness, but women are guaranteed to be ill, at least, once a month. The higher percentage of women in the force, the less reliable the health of the force is. Post edited at 1:34 am on Aug. 20, 2008 by Alabamarama
-------
Sexual innuendo.
|
|
|
k1Lka
Dairy Product Addict
|
yea, of course we need bitches in the army
-------
Don't corrupt your mind with the real world!
|
|
|
Luvlymii
Executive
|
Women are equal to men.
anything they can do, we can do as well
-------
_~Some things don't last forever, but some do~_
|
|
|
blufindr
Guru
Patron
|
Yes. Equal rights = equal chances to be shot.
-------
[ℓiחŋie]&[вeиηy]
[27.08.07]to[∞]
I don't know where to begin; Well I've just arrived
Now I'm locked in; and caught up in your mixed up world.
|
|
|
( Its Bearsy Bitch )
Enlightened One
 Sustainer
|
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:25 am on Aug. 20, 2008
 No, they should not. 1) Men would become overly protective of the women, especially if a relationship begins, and be distracted from tasks at hand. 2) If bunked together the men and women would be prone to sex. This would, undoubtedly, lead to unwanted pregnancies and coat-hanger abortions. 3) Funding would increase dramatically. 4) If a man is captured he is prone to physical abuse and death. If a woman is captured she is prone to physical abuse, death, and rape, (even gang rapes). 5) Men can go months without sickness, but women are guaranteed to be ill, at least, once a month. The higher percentage of women in the force, the less reliable the health of the force is. 
You again! btw you do know there are already women in the army right? They don't bunk together. And captured men are sexually abused too, see Abu Ghraib Post edited at 1:28 am on Aug. 20, 2008 by Its Bearsy Bitch
-------
there is a god
and his name is ijustdontknow christ
|
|
|
Alabamarama
Visionary
Patron
Support Leader
|
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 3:26 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:25 am on Aug. 20, 2008
No, they should not. 1) Men would become overly protective of the women, especially if a relationship begins, and be distracted from tasks at hand. 2) If bunked together the men and women would be prone to sex. This would, undoubtedly, lead to unwanted pregnancies and coat-hanger abortions. 3) Funding would increase dramatically. 4) If a man is captured he is prone to physical abuse and death. If a woman is captured she is prone to physical abuse, death, and rape, (even gang rapes). 5) Men can go months without sickness, but women are guaranteed to be ill, at least, once a month. The higher percentage of women in the force, the less reliable the health of the force is.
You again! btw you do know there are already women in the army right? They don't bunk together.
Me again.
Yes I know that, but there if there were to be a large influx of women into the military, I doubt that they would be live in separate bases from the men. Post edited at 1:28 am on Aug. 20, 2008 by Alabamarama
-------
Sexual innuendo.
|
|
|
jzbaby
I don't know what to put here.
Patron
|
Quote: from Alabamarama at 4:25 am on Aug. 20, 2008
No, they should not. 1) Men would become overly protective of the women, especially if a relationship begins, and be distracted from tasks at hand. 2) If bunked together the men and women would be prone to sex. This would, undoubtedly, lead to unwanted pregnancies and coat-hanger abortions. 3) Funding would increase dramatically. 4) If a man is captured he is prone to physical abuse and death. If a woman is captured she is prone to physical abuse, death, and rape, etc. 5) Men can go months without sickness, but women are guaranteed to be ill, at least, once a month. The higher percentage of women in the force, the less reliable the health of the force is.
There are woman in the military now..it doesn't seem to be an issue. They can live separately. In the everyday world men and women live together all the time, and there aren't any unusual number of "coat hanger abortions". Ill once a month? Do you consider a woman's period as her being ILL?
-------
I always say too much when I'm talking to you — that's one of the problems.
|
|
|
( Its Bearsy Bitch )
Enlightened One
Sustainer
|
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:27 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 3:26 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:25 am on Aug. 20, 2008
No, they should not. 1) Men would become overly protective of the women, especially if a relationship begins, and be distracted from tasks at hand. 2) If bunked together the men and women would be prone to sex. This would, undoubtedly, lead to unwanted pregnancies and coat-hanger abortions. 3) Funding would increase dramatically. 4) If a man is captured he is prone to physical abuse and death. If a woman is captured she is prone to physical abuse, death, and rape, (even gang rapes). 5) Men can go months without sickness, but women are guaranteed to be ill, at least, once a month. The higher percentage of women in the force, the less reliable the health of the force is.
You again! btw you do know there are already women in the army right? They don't bunk together.
Me again.
Yes I know that, but there if there were to be a large influx of women into the military, I doubt that they would be live in separate bases from the men.
uh why not
-------
there is a god
and his name is ijustdontknow christ
|
|
|
Alabamarama
Visionary
Patron
Support Leader
|
Quote: from jzbaby at 3:29 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 4:25 am on Aug. 20, 2008
No, they should not. 1) Men would become overly protective of the women, especially if a relationship begins, and be distracted from tasks at hand. 2) If bunked together the men and women would be prone to sex. This would, undoubtedly, lead to unwanted pregnancies and coat-hanger abortions. 3) Funding would increase dramatically. 4) If a man is captured he is prone to physical abuse and death. If a woman is captured she is prone to physical abuse, death, and rape, etc. 5) Men can go months without sickness, but women are guaranteed to be ill, at least, once a month. The higher percentage of women in the force, the less reliable the health of the force is.
There are woman in the military now..it doesn't seem to be an issue. They can live separately. In the everyday world men and women live together all the time, and there aren't any unusual number of "coat hanger abortions". Ill once a month? Do you consider a woman's period as her being ILL?
As I said, if there were to be as many women as men in the military during a draft, it would be more likely to be an issue. There is no draft, and there aren't as many women as there are men atm. Uhm, yes, I do. Women who are lucky enough not to have cramps or PMS have it good, but for the rest of us, there's a week out of the month where we can't be expected to preform at 100%.
-------
Sexual innuendo.
|
|
|
Alabamarama
Visionary
Patron
Support Leader
|
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 3:29 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:27 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 3:26 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:25 am on Aug. 20, 2008
No, they should not. 1) Men would become overly protective of the women, especially if a relationship begins, and be distracted from tasks at hand. 2) If bunked together the men and women would be prone to sex. This would, undoubtedly, lead to unwanted pregnancies and coat-hanger abortions. 3) Funding would increase dramatically. 4) If a man is captured he is prone to physical abuse and death. If a woman is captured she is prone to physical abuse, death, and rape, (even gang rapes). 5) Men can go months without sickness, but women are guaranteed to be ill, at least, once a month. The higher percentage of women in the force, the less reliable the health of the force is.
You again! btw you do know there are already women in the army right? They don't bunk together.
Me again.
Yes I know that, but there if there were to be a large influx of women into the military, I doubt that they would be live in separate bases from the men.
uh why not
Well that would cost a pretty penny. Maybe they wouldn't be, but that only enforces my #3.
-------
Sexual innuendo.
|
|
|
( Its Bearsy Bitch )
Enlightened One
Sustainer
|
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:31 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from jzbaby at 3:29 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 4:25 am on Aug. 20, 2008
No, they should not. 1) Men would become overly protective of the women, especially if a relationship begins, and be distracted from tasks at hand. 2) If bunked together the men and women would be prone to sex. This would, undoubtedly, lead to unwanted pregnancies and coat-hanger abortions. 3) Funding would increase dramatically. 4) If a man is captured he is prone to physical abuse and death. If a woman is captured she is prone to physical abuse, death, and rape, etc. 5) Men can go months without sickness, but women are guaranteed to be ill, at least, once a month. The higher percentage of women in the force, the less reliable the health of the force is.
There are woman in the military now..it doesn't seem to be an issue. They can live separately. In the everyday world men and women live together all the time, and there aren't any unusual number of "coat hanger abortions". Ill once a month? Do you consider a woman's period as her being ILL?
As I said, if there were to be as many women as men in the military during a draft, it would be more likely to be an issue. There is no draft, and there aren't as many women as there are men atm. Uhm, yes, I do. Women who are lucky enough not to have cramps or PMS have it good, but for the rest of us, there's a week out of the month where we can't be expected to preform at 100%.
Men go through hormonal changes every day throughout the day. How adequate their performance or temper is may depend on what time it is.
-------
there is a god
and his name is ijustdontknow christ
|
|
|
Alabamarama
Visionary
Patron
Support Leader
|
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 3:34 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:31 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from jzbaby at 3:29 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 4:25 am on Aug. 20, 2008
No, they should not. 1) Men would become overly protective of the women, especially if a relationship begins, and be distracted from tasks at hand. 2) If bunked together the men and women would be prone to sex. This would, undoubtedly, lead to unwanted pregnancies and coat-hanger abortions. 3) Funding would increase dramatically. 4) If a man is captured he is prone to physical abuse and death. If a woman is captured she is prone to physical abuse, death, and rape, etc. 5) Men can go months without sickness, but women are guaranteed to be ill, at least, once a month. The higher percentage of women in the force, the less reliable the health of the force is.
There are woman in the military now..it doesn't seem to be an issue. They can live separately. In the everyday world men and women live together all the time, and there aren't any unusual number of "coat hanger abortions". Ill once a month? Do you consider a woman's period as her being ILL?
As I said, if there were to be as many women as men in the military during a draft, it would be more likely to be an issue. There is no draft, and there aren't as many women as there are men atm. Uhm, yes, I do. Women who are lucky enough not to have cramps or PMS have it good, but for the rest of us, there's a week out of the month where we can't be expected to preform at 100%.
Men go through hormonal changes every day throughout the day. How adequate their performance or temper is may depend on what time it is.
It's the same thing for women, except for that one week when it's magnified by about 10, at least. Post edited at 1:36 am on Aug. 20, 2008 by Alabamarama
-------
Sexual innuendo.
|
|
|
( Its Bearsy Bitch )
Enlightened One
Sustainer
|
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:32 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 3:29 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:27 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 3:26 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:25 am on Aug. 20, 2008
No, they should not. 1) Men would become overly protective of the women, especially if a relationship begins, and be distracted from tasks at hand. 2) If bunked together the men and women would be prone to sex. This would, undoubtedly, lead to unwanted pregnancies and coat-hanger abortions. 3) Funding would increase dramatically. 4) If a man is captured he is prone to physical abuse and death. If a woman is captured she is prone to physical abuse, death, and rape, (even gang rapes). 5) Men can go months without sickness, but women are guaranteed to be ill, at least, once a month. The higher percentage of women in the force, the less reliable the health of the force is.
You again! btw you do know there are already women in the army right? They don't bunk together.
Me again.
Yes I know that, but there if there were to be a large influx of women into the military, I doubt that they would be live in separate bases from the men.
uh why not
Well that would cost a pretty penny. Maybe they wouldn't be, but that only enforces my #3.
What's the cost of saying, "You're a women, you bunk here, you're a man so you bunk here"? If there were a draft anyway you'd have to be building the same amount of new resting areas.
-------
there is a god
and his name is ijustdontknow christ
|
|
|
Alabamarama
Visionary
Patron
Support Leader
|
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 3:36 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:32 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 3:29 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:27 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Its Bearsy Bitch at 3:26 am on Aug. 20, 2008
Quote: from Alabamarama at 1:25 am on Aug. 20, 2008
No, they should not. 1) Men would become overly protective of the women, especially if a relationship begins, and be distracted from tasks at hand. 2) If bunked together the men and women would be prone to sex. This would, undoubtedly, lead to unwanted pregnancies and coat-hanger abortions. 3) Funding would increase dramatically. 4) If a man is captured he is prone to physical abuse and death. If a woman is captured she is prone to physical abuse, death, and rape, (even gang rapes). 5) Men can go months without sickness, but women are guaranteed to be ill, at least, once a month. The higher percentage of women in the force, the less reliable the health of the force is.
You again! btw you do know there are already women in the army right? They don't bunk together.
Me again.
Yes I know that, but there if there were to be a large influx of women into the military, I doubt that they would be live in separate bases from the men.
uh why not
Well that would cost a pretty penny. Maybe they wouldn't be, but that only enforces my #3.
What's the cost of saying, "You're a women, you bunk here, you're a man so you bunk here"? If there were a draft anyway you'd have to be building the same amount of new resting areas.
Ah, so you meant separate bunkers. Different from bases.
Large numbers of men + large numbers of women tends to = sex. Post edited at 1:39 am on Aug. 20, 2008 by Alabamarama
-------
Sexual innuendo.
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
| / / / Viewing Topic | |
|
780 users online 
186482 members 
You have 1 new message.
